In the matter of Waterfront Investments Group Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2015] NSWSC 18
The contractual obligation in respect of BBX trade dollar payments was an obligation for delivery of a commodity, not a debt payable in Australian dollars. Breach by failure to deliver BBX trade dollars gives rise to a claim for damages, not a debt, and Plaintiffs failed to prove loss. An equitable lien does not arise for non-payment of a commodity. No uncommercial transaction under s 588FB was established as Waterfront received value at or above market value. As to AUD 350,000 for unit 1A unpaid, that gave rise to a debt in favour of Waterfront. Mr Jammal breached his fiduciary and statutory duties in appropriating AUD 131,000 and directing payment of AUD 348,974 to Platnum, and Platnum...
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: John Kukulovski; Second Plaintiff: Waterfront Investments Group Pty Ltd (in liq); First Defendant: Eddy Investments (NSW) Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Edward Ahmajani; Third Defendant: NJ Investments (Aust) Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendant: Nicole Jammal; Fifth Defendant: Platnum Corporation Pty Ltd; Sixth Defendant: Samir Jammal; Seventh Defendant: National Australia Bank Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiffs in part; orders reserved pending submission of short minutes of order addressing orders and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Contracts, Breach of Contract, Uncommercial Transactions, Directors' Duties, Fiduciary Duties, Statutory Duties Under Corporations Act, Accessorial Liability, Vendor's Lien, Damages, Accounting Profits, Equitable Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kukulovski
First Plaintiff
Waterfront Investments Group Pty Ltd (in liq)
Second Plaintiff
Eddy Investments (NSW) Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Edward Ahmajani
Second Defendant
NJ Investments (Aust) Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Nicole Jammal
Fourth Defendant
Platnum Corporation Pty Ltd
Fifth Defendant
Samir Jammal
Sixth Defendant
National Australia Bank Limited
Seventh Defendant
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether special conditions in contracts required payment of purchase price by BBX trade dollars and/or Australian dollars
- 2 Whether failure to deliver BBX trade dollars gave rise to a claim in debt or damages
- 3 Whether an equitable lien could be established for unpaid BBX trade dollar portion
Ratio Decidendi
The contractual obligation in respect of BBX trade dollar payments was an obligation for delivery of a commodity, not a debt payable in Australian dollars. Breach by failure to deliver BBX trade dollars gives rise to a claim for damages, not a debt, and Plaintiffs failed to prove loss. An equitable lien does not arise for non-payment of a commodity. No uncommercial transaction under s 588FB was established as Waterfront received value at or above market value. As to AUD 350,000 for unit 1A unpaid, that gave rise to a debt in favour of Waterfront. Mr Jammal breached his fiduciary and statutory duties in appropriating AUD 131,000 and directing payment of AUD 348,974 to Platnum, and Platnum...
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs in part; orders reserved pending submission of short minutes of order addressing orders and costs.
Orders
- Plaintiffs to bring in agreed short minutes of order to give effect to judgment and dealing with costs within 21 days or, in absence of agreement, respective draft short minutes and short submissions as to differences.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment