Righi v Kissane Family Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 238

Righi v Kissane Family Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 238

On the proper construction of cl 11(5) of the May Deed, Trinity’s obligation to repay advances made by Kissane was limited to amounts received from ticket sales and interest accrued while held by Ticketek; there was no further liability to repay any shortfall beyond those amounts. This construction was supported by the contract terms, the commercial context, and principles regarding limiting recourse in loan agreements.

Parties
First Appellant: Sam Righi; Second Appellant: Alan Fleming; Third Appellant: Rodney Stewart; First Respondent: Kissane Family Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Trinity Sports & Events Management Pty Ltd (in liq)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 August 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Construction of Contracts, Repayment Limitation Clauses, Obligation to Repay Loans, Guarantees
Contract Construction of Contracts Repayment Limitation Clauses Obligation to Repay Loans Guarantees

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sam Righi

First Appellant

Alan Fleming

Second Appellant

Rodney Stewart

Third Appellant

Kissane Family Pty Ltd

First Respondent

Trinity Sports & Events Management Pty Ltd (in liq)

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether cl 11(5) of the May Deed limited Trinity’s obligation to repay advances to only the proceeds of ticket sales and interest from Ticketek
  2. 2 Whether Trinity had a residual obligation to repay unpaid advances beyond those proceeds
  3. 3 Proper construction of the relevant clauses in the context of the deed

Ratio Decidendi

On the proper construction of cl 11(5) of the May Deed, Trinity’s obligation to repay advances made by Kissane was limited to amounts received from ticket sales and interest accrued while held by Ticketek; there was no further liability to repay any shortfall beyond those amounts. This construction was supported by the contract terms, the commercial context, and principles regarding limiting recourse in loan agreements.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Orders made by Lindsay J on 22 April 2015 set aside.
  • Judgment for the fourth defendant and the fifth, sixth and seventh defendants.