PAGE v VANKER and ANOR [1990] NSWCA 143
The transfer of shares in Hynbrood Pty Ltd and Kadello Pty Ltd to Kelpie Industries Ltd did not amount to a sale of the 'Kelpie' rights and patents in the USA as contemplated by the agreement, as the transaction was not limited to those rights and no ascertainable sale price for the rights and patents could be identified, thus the payment event under the agreement was not triggered.
- Parties
- Appellant/first Defendant: Page; Respondent/plaintiff: Vanker; Second Defendant: Thompson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Commercial Division / Judgment – Appeal Allowed, Judgment Below Set Aside
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment for the defendants; costs to defendants below and on appeal; reference of relevant material to Deputy Commissioner of Taxation.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Contracts, Sale of Business Assets, Admissions of Fresh Evidence on Appeal, Proportional Payment Clauses, Corporate Structure and Effect on Contractual Obligations, Tax Evasion – Evidence and Reference to Tax Authorities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Page
Appellant/first Defendant
Vanker
Respondent/plaintiff
Thompson
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Commercial Division / Judgment – Appeal Allowed, Judgment Below Set Aside
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of shares in companies owning the 'Kelpie' rights and patents amounted to a sale of the rights and patents for the purpose of the agreement.
- 2 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal under s75A of the Supreme Court Act.
- 3 Whether the event triggering the obligation to pay $100,000 under the agreement had occurred.
Ratio Decidendi
The transfer of shares in Hynbrood Pty Ltd and Kadello Pty Ltd to Kelpie Industries Ltd did not amount to a sale of the 'Kelpie' rights and patents in the USA as contemplated by the agreement, as the transaction was not limited to those rights and no ascertainable sale price for the rights and patents could be identified, thus the payment event under the agreement was not triggered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment for the defendants; costs to defendants below and on appeal; reference of relevant material to Deputy Commissioner of Taxation.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Judgment below set aside and judgment for the defendants in lieu.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment