Taylor Square TT Pty Ltd v Kinselas Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 987

Taylor Square TT Pty Ltd v Kinselas Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 987

On the proper construction of cl 60.2 in its commercial context, Mr Toma guaranteed the prompt performance of all purchasers' obligations and undertook to render performance of the purchasers' obligation to complete if they did not. The phrase "If the obligation is to pay money" was not confined to a debt due and payable, but extended to the purchasers' obligation to pay the balance of the purchase price, interest and adjustments on settlement. Because the contracts remained on foot, the purchasers had repeatedly failed to complete and had not complied with orders for specific performance, the guarantee was engaged and damages were inadequate. Equity could act quia timet and compel Mr...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 August 2024
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding for Specific Performance of Contracts for Sale of Land and Businesses Against a Guarantor / Further Argument After Purchasers Failed to Complete and Failed to Comply With Orders for Specific Performance
Outcome
Orders for specific performance made against the Fifth Defendant, Mark Toma, and defendants ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs.
Legal Topics
['construction of Guarantees' 'specific Performance' 'quia Timet Relief' 'contracts for Sale of Land and Businesses' 'obligations to Pay Money']
['contract Law' 'equity' 'guarantees' 'property Law'] ['construction of Guarantees' 'specific Performance' 'quia Timet Relief' 'contracts for Sale of Land and Businesses' 'obligations to Pay Money']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceeding for Specific Performance of Contracts for Sale of Land and Businesses Against a Guarantor / Further Argument After Purchasers Failed to Complete and Failed to Comply With Orders for Specific Performance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the guarantee obliged Mark Toma to render performance of the purchasers' obligations to complete the contracts if the purchasers did not." 'Whether the vendors were entitled to orders for specific performance against the guarantor.' 'Whether the contractual phrase "obligation is to pay money" was confined to a debt due and payable or extended to the obligation to pay the purchase price on settlement.' 'Whether quia timet specific performance was available against the guarantor notwithstanding that the purchase price was not yet a debt owing at law.']

Ratio Decidendi

On the proper construction of cl 60.2 in its commercial context, Mr Toma guaranteed the prompt performance of all purchasers' obligations and undertook to render performance of the purchasers' obligation to complete if they did not. The phrase "If the obligation is to pay money" was not confined to a debt due and payable, but extended to the purchasers' obligation to pay the balance of the purchase price, interest and adjustments on settlement. Because the contracts remained on foot, the purchasers had repeatedly failed to complete and had not complied with orders for specific performance, the guarantee was engaged and damages were inadequate. Equity could act quia timet and compel Mr...

Court Disposition

Orders for specific performance made against the Fifth Defendant, Mark Toma, and defendants ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs.

Orders

  • ['Order that the Kinselas Land Contract, the Kinselas Business Contract, the Courthouse Land Contract and the Courthouse Business Contract (as those terms are defined in the Orders made on 18 June 2024) be specifically performed by the Fifth Defendant and carried into execution.' 'Direct that the Fifth Defendant pay...