HDI Global Specialty SE v Wonkana No. 3 Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 296
On their proper construction, the words 'declared to be quarantinable diseases under the Quarantine Act 1908 (Cth) and subsequent amendments' in the policies do not extend to diseases listed under the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth). The exclusion clause does not apply to COVID-19, which was not declared a quarantinable disease under the now-repealed Quarantine Act, and there is no basis for correcting the language by construction, as the mistake (if any) does not meet the threshold of absurdity nor is the parties’ objective intention clear enough to warrant such correction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Principal Judgment of Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed; declarations made in favour of insureds; cross-claim otherwise dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['construction of Insurance Policies' 'interpretation of Exclusion Clauses' 'ambiguity and Mistakes in Contract Drafting']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Principal Judgment of Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether exclusion clause in insurance policies referring to 'diseases declared to be quarantinable diseases under the Australian Quarantine Act 1908 and subsequent amendments' extends to diseases listed under the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth)" 'Whether reference to repealed legislation in insurance contracts is to be construed as reference to replacement legislation' 'Whether the contractual language can be corrected by construction due to alleged mistake']
Ratio Decidendi
On their proper construction, the words 'declared to be quarantinable diseases under the Quarantine Act 1908 (Cth) and subsequent amendments' in the policies do not extend to diseases listed under the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth). The exclusion clause does not apply to COVID-19, which was not declared a quarantinable disease under the now-repealed Quarantine Act, and there is no basis for correcting the language by construction, as the mistake (if any) does not meet the threshold of absurdity nor is the parties’ objective intention clear enough to warrant such correction.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed; declarations made in favour of insureds; cross-claim otherwise dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Summons dismissed.' "Declaration: On the proper construction of the 'Tourist Parks & Lifestyle Villages Insurance Policy' issued by the first plaintiff to the first, second, and third defendants for the cover period 28 February 2020 to 28 February 2021, COVID-19 is not a disease declared to be a quarantinable...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment