Austin v Union Trustee Company of Australia Limited [1934] HCA 30

Austin v Union Trustee Company of Australia Limited [1934] HCA 30

The annuity to the widow was a first charge on the testator’s estate only until the appropriation of a fund sufficient to provide the annuity. Following appropriation, the annuity must be paid from that fund alone, and the residue of the estate is freed from the charge, save for the fund. The testator’s intention, as shown by specific provisions, was to limit the continuing charge to the appropriated fund once established.

Parties
Appellants / Defendants: Austin and others; Plaintiff / Respondent: Union Trustee Company of Australia Limited; Defendant / Respondent: Cecile Viva Condamine Whittingham; Defendants / Appellants: Trustees and Board of Control of the Geelong Church of England Grammar School, Corio, Victoria
Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Will/probate: Special Case Stated for Opinion; Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of Queensland, Decision by High Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Order of the Supreme Court varied.
Legal Topics
Construction of Testamentary Dispositions, Appropriation of Fund for Annuity, Priority and Extent of Charge on Estate, Trustee Liability and Discharge
Wills and Estates Trusts Equity Construction of Testamentary Dispositions Appropriation of Fund for Annuity Priority and Extent of Charge on Estate Trustee Liability and Discharge

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Austin and others

Appellants / Defendants

Union Trustee Company of Australia Limited

Plaintiff / Respondent

Cecile Viva Condamine Whittingham

Defendant / Respondent

Trustees and Board of Control of the Geelong Church of England Grammar School, Corio, Victoria

Defendants / Appellants

Procedural Posture

Will/probate: Special Case Stated for Opinion; Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of Queensland, Decision by High Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Is the annuity given by the testator's will to his widow charged on the whole estate or only up to appropriation of a fund?
  2. 2 Does the residue of the estate remain charged with the annuity after appropriation of a fund?
  3. 3 To what extent is the trustee liable for deficiencies in income to pay the annuity resulting from reduced investment returns?

Ratio Decidendi

The annuity to the widow was a first charge on the testator’s estate only until the appropriation of a fund sufficient to provide the annuity. Following appropriation, the annuity must be paid from that fund alone, and the residue of the estate is freed from the charge, save for the fund. The testator’s intention, as shown by specific provisions, was to limit the continuing charge to the appropriated fund once established.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Order of the Supreme Court varied.

Orders

  • Order of the Supreme Court varied by answering questions in the special case as per the written judgment: 1(a) At first only. (b) No. (c) On appropriation of the fund. 2(a) Yes. (b) Yes. Further detailed answers as specified in the judgment.
  • Costs of all parties as between solicitor and client out of the residuary estate.