Davis v Adventist Development and Relief Agency [2006] NSWSC 876

Davis v Adventist Development and Relief Agency [2006] NSWSC 876

On the true construction of Iris Leila Davis's homemade will, the final gift of "whatever money is left" disposed of the residue of the estate after payment of pecuniary legacies, and the deceased intended that residue to be held by Australasian Conference Association Limited for the charitable purposes of Adventist Development and Relief Agency Australia Limited, the reference to the Seventh-Day Adventist Conference being a misnomer for the second defendant.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 August 2006
Procedural Posture
Will Construction Case / Judgment
Outcome
The Court construed the will as leaving the residuary estate to Australasian Conference Association Limited to be applied for the charitable purposes of Adventist Development and Relief Agency Australia Limited.
Legal Topics
['construction of Will' 'residuary Gift' 'charitable Gift' 'misnomer of Charitable Organisation' 'unincorporated Association and Incorporated Successor']
['wills, Probate and Administration' 'equity' 'charities'] ['construction of Will' 'residuary Gift' 'charitable Gift' 'misnomer of Charitable Organisation' 'unincorporated Association and Incorporated Successor']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Will Construction Case / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the clause giving "whatever money is left to go to the ADRA for the Seventh-Day Adventist Conference" carried the residue of the deceased\'s estate.' 'Whether the residuary gift was valid notwithstanding that ADRA had been an unincorporated association at the date of the will and was later incorporated, and notwithstanding the reference to the Seventh-Day Adventist Conference.']

Ratio Decidendi

On the true construction of Iris Leila Davis's homemade will, the final gift of "whatever money is left" disposed of the residue of the estate after payment of pecuniary legacies, and the deceased intended that residue to be held by Australasian Conference Association Limited for the charitable purposes of Adventist Development and Relief Agency Australia Limited, the reference to the Seventh-Day Adventist Conference being a misnomer for the second defendant.

Court Disposition

The Court construed the will as leaving the residuary estate to Australasian Conference Association Limited to be applied for the charitable purposes of Adventist Development and Relief Agency Australia Limited.

Orders

  • ['Upon the true construction of the will of Iris Leila Davis (deceased), her residuary estate is left to the Australasian Conference Association Limited to be applied for the charitable purposes of Adventist Development and Relief Agency Australia Limited.' 'The costs of the plaintiff and the first and second...