Reinhard v Bell [2015] NSWSC 818
In the context of clause 8(b) and the will as a whole, the construction treating "of" as retaining its ordinary wording was strained and unnatural, if not ungrammatical, and required reading in concepts such as descendants of any generation. The surrounding text showed that "them" and "those" referred to "such children of my said child". It was sufficiently clear that "of" was erroneously included when "or" was intended, so the gift should be construed as applying to those grandchildren then living or the children of those grandchildren then dead, taking their parent's share per stirpes and not per capita.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Summons by Trustees Concerning Construction of Clause 8(b) of a Will / Hearing of Prayer 1; Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration made as to true construction of gift in will; plaintiffs' costs ordered to be paid out of the trust estate on an indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['construction of Wills' 'typographical Error in Will' 'trustee Act Judicial Advice' 'real Estate Gifts Under Will']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Summons by Trustees Concerning Construction of Clause 8(b) of a Will / Hearing of Prayer 1; Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether clause 8(b) of the will contained an error in expression in the phrase "those of them then living of the children of those who may then be dead".' 'Whether the word "of" should be read as "or" in construing the gift of real estate after expiration of the period of postponement of distribution.']
Ratio Decidendi
In the context of clause 8(b) and the will as a whole, the construction treating "of" as retaining its ordinary wording was strained and unnatural, if not ungrammatical, and required reading in concepts such as descendants of any generation. The surrounding text showed that "them" and "those" referred to "such children of my said child". It was sufficiently clear that "of" was erroneously included when "or" was intended, so the gift should be construed as applying to those grandchildren then living or the children of those grandchildren then dead, taking their parent's share per stirpes and not per capita.
Court Disposition
Declaration made as to true construction of gift in will; plaintiffs' costs ordered to be paid out of the trust estate on an indemnity basis.
Orders
- ['Declares that upon the true construction of the Will of William Gotlett Reinhard, late of Oddfield near Wellington in the State of New South Wales, made on 2 May 1925, the word "of" where it appears second in the seventeenth line on page 3 of the Will, is to be read as "or", so that such part of clause 8(b) is to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment