Davies v Littlejohn [1923] HCA 64
The Crown Lands Consolidation Act 1913 (N.S.W.) establishes a statutory scheme for conditional purchases in which the Crown does not have a vendor's lien over the land for unpaid instalments, nor do such instalments constitute a charge or encumbrance on the land or the interest of the conditional purchaser; the potential for forfeiture for non-payment is an inherent part of the statutory right, not an extrinsic encumbrance or charge. Thus, under the will, 'charges or encumbrances' to be paid from residuary income do not include unpaid instalments owing to the Crown on conditional purchases.
- Parties
- Appellants: Davies and others; Respondents: Littlejohn and others
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 1923
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Order of Supreme Court of New South Wales varied.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Wills, Vendor's Lien, Conditional Purchase Under Crown Lands Acts, Meaning of 'charge' or 'encumbrance', Nature of Statutory Landholding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Davies and others
Appellants
Littlejohn and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether unpaid instalments owing to the Crown on conditionally purchased land are 'charges or encumbrances' under the terms of a will
- 2 Whether the Crown has a vendor's lien on conditionally purchased land for unpaid instalments under the Crown Lands Consolidation Act 1913 (N.S.W.)
- 3 Whether future unpaid instalments constitute a charge or encumbrance on the land or interest therein
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown Lands Consolidation Act 1913 (N.S.W.) establishes a statutory scheme for conditional purchases in which the Crown does not have a vendor's lien over the land for unpaid instalments, nor do such instalments constitute a charge or encumbrance on the land or the interest of the conditional purchaser; the potential for forfeiture for non-payment is an inherent part of the statutory right, not an extrinsic encumbrance or charge. Thus, under the will, 'charges or encumbrances' to be paid from residuary income do not include unpaid instalments owing to the Crown on conditional purchases.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Order of Supreme Court of New South Wales varied.
Orders
- Declaration that charges and encumbrances to be paid out of the surplus income of the residuary estate do not include the instalments on conditionally purchased lands which were unpaid at the date of death.
- Omission of consequential orders treating such instalments as charges or encumbrances.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment