Pisano v Dandris (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 1689
Ms Dandris knowingly breached a freezing order by transferring $125,000 out of her account while aware of the order's effect, constituting a serious and deliberate contempt, for which a community service order is required to vindicate the Court's authority and deter others.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Contempt in Civil Proceedings / Sentencing After Finding of Contempt Proved
- Outcome
- Guilty of contempt and sentenced to perform community service
- Legal Topics
- ['contempt of Court' 'freezing/asset Preservation Orders' 'sentencing' 'community Service Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Contempt in Civil Proceedings / Sentencing After Finding of Contempt Proved
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Ms Dandris committed contempt by breaching freezing order' 'Appropriate sentencing for proven contempt' 'Application of aggravating and mitigating factors under Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Dandris knowingly breached a freezing order by transferring $125,000 out of her account while aware of the order's effect, constituting a serious and deliberate contempt, for which a community service order is required to vindicate the Court's authority and deter others.
Court Disposition
Guilty of contempt and sentenced to perform community service
Orders
- ['Ms Georgia Dandris declared guilty of contempt of court in respect of the payment out of $125,000 on 14 November 2013.' 'Ms Dandris ordered to perform 40 hours of community service.' 'Ms Dandris directed to report to NSW Probation and Parole Service within 14 days.' 'Explanation of obligations under Crimes...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment