Cooper, in the matter of Chopsonion Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) v Chopsonion Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2017] FCA 1207
Mr Sharpe was aware of the court's order and failed to comply. The failure was deliberate and not excused by his health conditions. The plaintiffs proved beyond reasonable doubt that the contempt was committed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application/contempt Proceeding / Determination of Contempt Charge and Directions on Penalty
- Outcome
- Declaration made that James Trevor Sharpe has committed contempt of court. Orders made dispensing with requirements of r 41.07 and r 41.06 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. Further hearing to be conducted regarding penalty.
- Legal Topics
- ['contempt of Court' 'receivership' 'enforcement of Court Orders' 'personal Service Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application/contempt Proceeding / Determination of Contempt Charge and Directions on Penalty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the third defendant, Mr Sharpe, committed contempt of court by failing to comply with the order to deliver up books and records' "Whether Mr Sharpe's ill health negated the wilfulness required for contempt"]
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Sharpe was aware of the court's order and failed to comply. The failure was deliberate and not excused by his health conditions. The plaintiffs proved beyond reasonable doubt that the contempt was committed.
Court Disposition
Declaration made that James Trevor Sharpe has committed contempt of court. Orders made dispensing with requirements of r 41.07 and r 41.06 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. Further hearing to be conducted regarding penalty.
Orders
- ['Declaration that James Trevor Sharpe has committed a contempt in failing to comply with the order made on 26 August 2016.' 'Requirement for compliance with r 41.07 to the extent that service of the 26 August 2016 order be personal is dispensed with.' 'Requirement for compliance with r 41.06 to the extent that the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment