Microsoft Corp v Business Boost Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1384
There were serious questions to be tried on both the law and the facts regarding copyright and trademark infringement, and on the balance of convenience an interlocutory injunction against Milosevic was appropriate given the evidence and absence of demonstrated hardship.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory (application for Injunction)
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- ['copyright in Computer Programs' 'trademark Infringement' 'interlocutory Injunctions' 'authorisation of Infringement' 'balance of Convenience']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory (application for Injunction)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether launching a computer program for temporary storage and operation in RAM is a reproduction in a material form under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)' 'Whether transfer of a program to hard disk is a reproduction in a material form' 'Whether the respondent reproduced or authorised reproduction of Microsoft programs without licence' "Whether there was infringement or authorisation of infringement of registered trade marks 'MICROSOFT' and 'WINDOWS'" 'Whether misrepresentations were made regarding licensing of installed software' 'Whether interlocutory injunction should be granted due to balance of convenience']
Ratio Decidendi
There were serious questions to be tried on both the law and the facts regarding copyright and trademark infringement, and on the balance of convenience an interlocutory injunction against Milosevic was appropriate given the evidence and absence of demonstrated hardship.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunction granted
Orders
- ['The applicant is directed to bring in proposed Short Minutes of Order within seven days.' 'The motion by Milosevic for particulars is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment