United Broadcasting International Pty Limited v Turkplus Pty Limited (No 2) [2010] FCA 1413
Default judgment was warranted against the third respondent due to procedural default in compliance with discovery orders and failure to attend directions. An injunction was appropriate to restrain further copyright infringement, but declaratory relief and fiduciary duty declarations lacked utility. Costs should be ordered as a gross sum, subject to leave for the respondent to challenge.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Default Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Default judgment granted in part; permanent injunction granted; declaration refused; costs awarded as gross sum with leave to challenge; leave to discontinue between applicants and first respondent; bank guarantee to be released.
- Legal Topics
- ['copyright Infringement' 'fiduciary Duty' 'default Judgment' 'declaratory Relief' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Default Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether default judgment should be granted against the third respondent.' 'Whether appropriate to grant declaratory relief for copyright infringement and breach of fiduciary duty.' 'Whether appropriate to grant an injunction restraining copyright infringement.' 'Appropriateness of awarding costs as a gross sum.']
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment was warranted against the third respondent due to procedural default in compliance with discovery orders and failure to attend directions. An injunction was appropriate to restrain further copyright infringement, but declaratory relief and fiduciary duty declarations lacked utility. Costs should be ordered as a gross sum, subject to leave for the respondent to challenge.
Court Disposition
Default judgment granted in part; permanent injunction granted; declaration refused; costs awarded as gross sum with leave to challenge; leave to discontinue between applicants and first respondent; bank guarantee to be released.
Orders
- ['Applicants to bring in draft orders giving effect to reasons.' "Permanent injunction restraining third respondent from infringing second applicant's copyright in the ATV Channel." 'Leave to applicants and first respondent to discontinue proceedings between themselves with no order as to costs.' 'Bank guarantee...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment