Leica Geosystems Pty Ltd v Koudstaal (No 3) [2014] FCA 1129
The first respondent admitted copying a large volume of applicants' core confidential source code and associated materials to an external hard drive without authorisation, both during and after employment with the first applicant, and further admitted possessing and accessing the materials after leaving employment. This conduct constituted infringement of copyright, breach of duty of confidence, breach of relevant employment contract terms, and improper use under s 183(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), justifying declaratory, injunctive, compensatory, and additional damages and other orders sought, notwithstanding the absence of proven compensable loss.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Leica Geosystems Pty Ltd (ACN 000 112 765); Second Applicant: Leica Geosystems AG; Third Applicant: Leica Geosystems Mining Inc; First Respondent: Andrew Koudstaal; Second Respondent: Automated Positioning Systems Pty Ltd (ACN 098 359 301)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Declaratory relief, injunctions, compensatory and additional damages awards, costs orders in favour of applicants against first respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidentiality, Employment Contract Breach, Breach of Statutory Duties (corporations Act)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leica Geosystems Pty Ltd (ACN 000 112 765)
First Applicant
Leica Geosystems AG
Second Applicant
Leica Geosystems Mining Inc
Third Applicant
Andrew Koudstaal
First Respondent
Automated Positioning Systems Pty Ltd (ACN 098 359 301)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the first respondent infringe the applicants' copyright in software and related materials?
- 2 Did the first respondent breach the equitable obligation of confidence owed to the applicants?
- 3 Did the first respondent breach his employment contract with Leica Australia?
Ratio Decidendi
The first respondent admitted copying a large volume of applicants' core confidential source code and associated materials to an external hard drive without authorisation, both during and after employment with the first applicant, and further admitted possessing and accessing the materials after leaving employment. This conduct constituted infringement of copyright, breach of duty of confidence, breach of relevant employment contract terms, and improper use under s 183(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), justifying declaratory, injunctive, compensatory, and additional damages and other orders sought, notwithstanding the absence of proven compensable loss.
Court Disposition
Declaratory relief, injunctions, compensatory and additional damages awards, costs orders in favour of applicants against first respondent.
Orders
- Declaration of copyright infringement by first respondent.
- Declaration of wrongful use and disclosure of confidential information (breach of confidence).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment