Forty Two International Pty Limited v Barnes [2014] FCA 217
Costs should be apportioned to reflect both parties' success and failure on respective claims, with respondents to pay 75% of applicants' combined costs due to applicants' overall substantial success but reduction for abandoned and unsuccessful claims, adopting a broad evaluative approach given shared evidence and representation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs and Final Orders Following Substantive Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for second applicant against respondents; cross-claim dismissed; respondents to pay 75% of applicants' combined costs; applicants to pay respondents' costs as previously ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['cost Apportionment' 'discretion Under S 43 Federal Court of Australia Act' 'damages' 'interest Calculation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs and Final Orders Following Substantive Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should be apportioned between parties according to success or failure on separate issues' 'Appropriate calculation of damages and interest']
Ratio Decidendi
Costs should be apportioned to reflect both parties' success and failure on respective claims, with respondents to pay 75% of applicants' combined costs due to applicants' overall substantial success but reduction for abandoned and unsuccessful claims, adopting a broad evaluative approach given shared evidence and representation.
Court Disposition
Judgment for second applicant against respondents; cross-claim dismissed; respondents to pay 75% of applicants' combined costs; applicants to pay respondents' costs as previously ordered.
Orders
- ['Judgment entered for the second applicant against the first and second respondents in the amount of $3,062,406.93 comprising damages of $2 million together with interest calculated to 14 March 2014 inclusively in accordance with s 51A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) in the amount of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment