Cass Training Pty Ltd v Bimoli and Bhetwal Family Pty Ltd; Bimoli and Bhetwal Family Pty Ltd v Cass Training Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2023] NSWCATCD 20
Since both parties' applications were unsuccessful, and to avoid possible enforcement of contractual rights to costs, the appropriate costs order is that each party bear its own costs of the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application (consumer and Commercial Division) / Post Dismissal of Principal Applications; Decision on Costs
- Outcome
- Each party bear its own costs of the application; hearing on costs dispensed with.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'exercise of Discretion in Costs' "effect of 'no Order as to Costs' Orders"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application (consumer and Commercial Division) / Post Dismissal of Principal Applications; Decision on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal should make an explicit order that each party bear its own costs to avoid contractual rights to costs' 'Appropriate expression of costs orders where both parties were unsuccessful']
Ratio Decidendi
Since both parties' applications were unsuccessful, and to avoid possible enforcement of contractual rights to costs, the appropriate costs order is that each party bear its own costs of the application.
Court Disposition
Each party bear its own costs of the application; hearing on costs dispensed with.
Orders
- ['A hearing on costs is dispensed with pursuant to section 50(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013.' "Each party bear the party's own costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment