Lo v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2013] FCA 639
Stone and Banh (third and fourth respondents) should pay the applicants' costs from 24 April 2013 to 17 May 2013, because after terminating their agreements and failing to inform other parties, their conduct was unreasonable and unnecessarily caused further costs. Otherwise, no order as to costs as all parties acted reasonably. Commonwealth to pay applicants' costs of interlocutory application filed 21 May 2013. No indemnity costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Application Discontinued by Leave; Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review discontinued by leave; costs orders as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'judicial Review' 'discontinuance of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Application Discontinued by Leave; Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether applicants or respondents should pay costs after discontinuance of application due to supervening event' "Whether parties' conduct was reasonable up to and after the supervening event"]
Ratio Decidendi
Stone and Banh (third and fourth respondents) should pay the applicants' costs from 24 April 2013 to 17 May 2013, because after terminating their agreements and failing to inform other parties, their conduct was unreasonable and unnecessarily caused further costs. Otherwise, no order as to costs as all parties acted reasonably. Commonwealth to pay applicants' costs of interlocutory application filed 21 May 2013. No indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review discontinued by leave; costs orders as specified.
Orders
- ['Leave granted to applicants to file notice of discontinuance within seven days.' "Third and fourth respondents to pay applicants' costs from 24 April 2013 until 17 May 2013." 'Interlocutory application filed by first and second respondents on 21 May 2013 dismissed with costs (to be paid by the Commonwealth).'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment