Johnson & Anor v Clancy & Anor [2010] NSWSC 1301
The Plaintiffs, having discontinued proceedings by consent without a hearing on the merits, did not establish proper justification to depart from the ordinary position under rule 42.19. The Defendants acted reasonably; the Plaintiffs’ continued prosecution after relevant facts emerged was not justified. Therefore, the Plaintiffs are to pay the Defendants’ costs incurred up to discontinuance, including costs of the notice of motion and costs argument hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application Following Discontinuance / Post Discontinuance, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs to pay Defendants' costs of the proceedings up to discontinuance, costs of notice of motion, and costs of hearing argument; exhibits to be returned.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'discontinuance' 'specific Performance' 'contract Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application Following Discontinuance / Post Discontinuance, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Who should bear the costs when proceedings are discontinued by consent without determination on the merits' 'Whether there are grounds to depart from the ordinary rule under UCPR 42.19 for costs upon discontinuance']
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiffs, having discontinued proceedings by consent without a hearing on the merits, did not establish proper justification to depart from the ordinary position under rule 42.19. The Defendants acted reasonably; the Plaintiffs’ continued prosecution after relevant facts emerged was not justified. Therefore, the Plaintiffs are to pay the Defendants’ costs incurred up to discontinuance, including costs of the notice of motion and costs argument hearing.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs to pay Defendants' costs of the proceedings up to discontinuance, costs of notice of motion, and costs of hearing argument; exhibits to be returned.
Orders
- ["Plaintiffs to pay Defendants' costs up to notice of discontinuance." 'Defendants to have their costs of the notice of motion filed 8 October 2010.' "Plaintiffs to pay Defendants' costs of hearing costs argument." 'Exhibits tendered on costs application to be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment