About Life Pty Ltd v Kloczko [2020] NSWSC 1909
Given that Maddocks were successful in obtaining the relief sought by agreement, and About Life was unsuccessful in obtaining security by mortgage, the Court determined that Maddocks’ costs of the Security Motion should be Maddocks’ costs of the proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Claim / Costs Determination Following Security for Costs Application
- Outcome
- Costs order in favour of cross-defendants/applicants (Maddocks)
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'security for Costs' 'quantum and Form of Security']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim / Costs Determination Following Security for Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Maddocks (cross-defendants) are entitled to costs of the Security Motion' 'Whether the applicants were wholly successful in the security for costs application' "Whether costs should follow the event or be the parties' costs in the proceedings"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given that Maddocks were successful in obtaining the relief sought by agreement, and About Life was unsuccessful in obtaining security by mortgage, the Court determined that Maddocks’ costs of the Security Motion should be Maddocks’ costs of the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Costs order in favour of cross-defendants/applicants (Maddocks)
Orders
- ["Cross-Defendants' costs of the motion filed 7 June 2019 be the Cross-Defendants' costs of the proceedings"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment