James v Phillips (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 257
The Court has power to make a gross-sum costs order under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98(4)(c). However, because of comity and judicial restraint regarding federal proceedings, costs for the Federal Circuit Court were excluded. Applying a 12% discount for excess in reviewed invoices, the Supreme Court ordered the plaintiffs to pay the defendants $65,789.63 in indemnity costs for these proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Post Judgment Orders
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs ordered to pay indemnity costs to defendants in the sum specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'gross Sum Costs Order' 'indemnity Costs' 'cost Assessment Discount' 'jurisdiction Over Costs in Federal Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Post Judgment Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Supreme Court of NSW has power to order costs incurred in Federal Circuit Court proceedings' 'Whether specific claimed costs (internal communications, litigation funding expenses) are recoverable on an indemnity basis' 'Whether a discount should be applied to claimed costs on a gross-sum lump basis']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court has power to make a gross-sum costs order under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98(4)(c). However, because of comity and judicial restraint regarding federal proceedings, costs for the Federal Circuit Court were excluded. Applying a 12% discount for excess in reviewed invoices, the Supreme Court ordered the plaintiffs to pay the defendants $65,789.63 in indemnity costs for these proceedings.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs ordered to pay indemnity costs to defendants in the sum specified.
Orders
- ['Plaintiffs to pay to the defendants the sum of $65,789.63.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment