Ceerose Pty Limited v A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd (No 6) [2023] NSWSC 1460
Despite limited successes, the plaintiff was substantially unsuccessful in setting aside the adjudication determinations and adopted an approach contrary to the policy of the Security of Payment Act. Costs should follow the event; reserved costs do not justify a departure from this rule. The plaintiff should pay 90 percent of the defendant's costs of both proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Determination Following Substantive Adjudication Challenge Proceedings / Post Judgment Costs Order
- Outcome
- Plaintiff to pay 90 percent of the defendant's costs of both proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'security of Payment' 'adjudication Determinations' 'party/party Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Determination Following Substantive Adjudication Challenge Proceedings / Post Judgment Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should follow the event in Security of Payment Act proceedings' 'Extent to which interlocutory application successes should affect costs order']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite limited successes, the plaintiff was substantially unsuccessful in setting aside the adjudication determinations and adopted an approach contrary to the policy of the Security of Payment Act. Costs should follow the event; reserved costs do not justify a departure from this rule. The plaintiff should pay 90 percent of the defendant's costs of both proceedings.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff to pay 90 percent of the defendant's costs of both proceedings.
Orders
- ["The plaintiff pay 90 percent of the defendant's costs of both proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment