The Pharmacy Guild of Australia v Ramsay Health Care Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1398
This was not a case where apportionment of costs was warranted, as the issues were not sufficiently dominant or separable, and much of the evidence and argument overlapped between them. Accordingly, there was no basis to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Proceedings / Post Judgment Costs Order
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs ordered to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'declaratory Relief' 'standing' 'abuse of Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Proceedings / Post Judgment Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether costs should be apportioned given the parties' respective successes and failures on separate issues" 'Whether the ordinary rule that costs follow the event should be departed from in this case']
Ratio Decidendi
This was not a case where apportionment of costs was warranted, as the issues were not sufficiently dominant or separable, and much of the evidence and argument overlapped between them. Accordingly, there was no basis to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs ordered to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis.
Orders
- ["Order that the plaintiffs pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment