Dentown Pty Limited v PWI Group Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 692
Given that neither party can truly be considered the winner of the event, and each achieved some degree of success, and considering that some evidence may be relevant at final hearing, costs should be costs in the cause for applications addressed in the hearing, while remaining costs are reserved or borne by each party as appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Relief/costs / Interlocutory Application Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs orders made as set out in paragraph 12 (final orders): costs of applications on 2, 4, 5 May 2016 to be costs in the cause; other costs reserved; motion costs in the cause; parties bear own costs of this application.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'interlocutory Relief' 'freezing Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Relief/costs / Interlocutory Application Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['How should costs be awarded concerning applications for freezing orders and interlocutory motions where both sides have achieved partial success?' 'Whether costs relating to the various interlocutory applications should be deemed costs in the cause, reserved, or payable by a specific party.']
Ratio Decidendi
Given that neither party can truly be considered the winner of the event, and each achieved some degree of success, and considering that some evidence may be relevant at final hearing, costs should be costs in the cause for applications addressed in the hearing, while remaining costs are reserved or borne by each party as appropriate.
Court Disposition
Costs orders made as set out in paragraph 12 (final orders): costs of applications on 2, 4, 5 May 2016 to be costs in the cause; other costs reserved; motion costs in the cause; parties bear own costs of this application.
Orders
- ["The costs of the plaintiffs' application for freezing orders, insofar as the appearances on 2, 4 and 5 May 2016 are concerned, will be costs in the cause." "The remaining costs of the plaintiffs' application for freezing orders are reserved." "The costs of the defendants' Notice of Motion dated 3 May 2016 will be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment