C & C Fisher Pty Ltd v Livadaras (No 2) [2010] FCA 181
The applicants' rejection of the so-called Calderbank offer was not unreasonable as the offer was not a true Calderbank offer. The applicants’ case raised arguable factual and legal issues, and did not rise to the standard necessary for indemnity costs, as it was not hopeless, nor pursued with knowledge of falsity. The allegation of bad faith was relevant to the dispute and not knowingly false.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Costs / Post Judgment (costs)
- Outcome
- Application for indemnity costs dismissed; costs awarded as specified in orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offer']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs / Post Judgment (costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether respondents are entitled to indemnity costs from the applicants' 'Whether rejection of Calderbank offer by applicants was unreasonable or imprudent' 'Whether applicants pursued allegations of bad faith amounting to equitable fraud without basis']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants' rejection of the so-called Calderbank offer was not unreasonable as the offer was not a true Calderbank offer. The applicants’ case raised arguable factual and legal issues, and did not rise to the standard necessary for indemnity costs, as it was not hopeless, nor pursued with knowledge of falsity. The allegation of bad faith was relevant to the dispute and not knowingly false.
Court Disposition
Application for indemnity costs dismissed; costs awarded as specified in orders.
Orders
- ["The applicants pay the respondents' costs of and incidental to these proceedings on a party and party basis." "The respondents pay the applicants' costs of this application for costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment