Islam v Khan & Ors (No.2) [2023] NSWDC 509
The Court found that, although the plaintiff had not complied with pleading rules, the conduct did not reach the standard requiring indemnity costs given the plaintiff’s self-represented status and lack of evidence for gross sum costs. Costs were ordered on the ordinary basis, save in relation to the directions hearing of 22 June 2023.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Dismissal Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs on the ordinary basis, except for the costs of the directions hearing of 22 June 2023.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'self Represented Litigants' 'pleading Rules']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Dismissal Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be awarded against the plaintiff' 'Whether costs should be awarded on the ordinary basis' 'Entitlement to gross lump sum costs order']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that, although the plaintiff had not complied with pleading rules, the conduct did not reach the standard requiring indemnity costs given the plaintiff’s self-represented status and lack of evidence for gross sum costs. Costs were ordered on the ordinary basis, save in relation to the directions hearing of 22 June 2023.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs on the ordinary basis, except for the costs of the directions hearing of 22 June 2023.
Orders
- ['Save as to the costs of the directions hearing of 22 June 2023, the plaintiff is to pay the first, second and third defendants’ costs of the proceeding on the ordinary basis, as agreed or assessed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment