Surfing Hardware International Holdings Pty Limited and Ors v William McCausland and Anor (No 6) [2007] NSWIRComm 285
The Full Bench lacks the power or discretion to re-open perfected appeal orders to admit further evidence or make additional substantive orders, except as allowed for the correction of error or slip; subsequent events do not justify reopening or amending final orders. Regarding costs, the circumstances and procedural rules allow for costs of the appeal to be ordered forthwith, given the discrete nature and final determination of the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment Applications Regarding Costs and Finality
- Outcome
- Respondents' second amended motion dismissed; appellants awarded costs as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'jurisdiction of Industrial Court' 'power to Re Open Appeal' 'confidentiality Undertakings' 'finality of Judgments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Applications Regarding Costs and Finality
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Full Bench has power to re-open appeal proceedings after entry of orders' 'Whether further material should be admitted with respect to costs' 'Implications for costs orders of events after the substantive appeal' 'Whether costs should be payable forthwith']
Ratio Decidendi
The Full Bench lacks the power or discretion to re-open perfected appeal orders to admit further evidence or make additional substantive orders, except as allowed for the correction of error or slip; subsequent events do not justify reopening or amending final orders. Regarding costs, the circumstances and procedural rules allow for costs of the appeal to be ordered forthwith, given the discrete nature and final determination of the application.
Court Disposition
Respondents' second amended motion dismissed; appellants awarded costs as specified.
Orders
- ["The respondents' second amended motion is dismissed." "The respondents shall, forthwith, pay the appellants' costs of the appeal, as agreed or assessed." "The respondents shall pay the appellants' costs of the notice of motion heard by Marks J on 14 July 2006, as agreed or assessed." "The respondents shall pay the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment