Cambodian Buddhist Society of New South Wales and Anor v Meng Eang Thai and Others [2018] NSWSC 569
The costs order was clarified because the Court intended the Defendants to pay 50% of the Second Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings, not merely the costs of the issue on which he was entirely successful, having regard to the invalid December 2016 election, electoral irregularities, and the wrongful removal of the Second Plaintiff.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Costs / Judgment on the Papers Clarifying Costs
- Outcome
- Clarification of costs order made.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'clarification of Costs Order' 'discretion as to Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs / Judgment on the Papers Clarifying Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the earlier costs order required the Defendants to pay 50% of the Second Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings or only the costs of the issue on which he was successful."]
Ratio Decidendi
The costs order was clarified because the Court intended the Defendants to pay 50% of the Second Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings, not merely the costs of the issue on which he was entirely successful, having regard to the invalid December 2016 election, electoral irregularities, and the wrongful removal of the Second Plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Clarification of costs order made.
Orders
- ["The Defendants should pay 50% of the Second Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment