David GILBEY & Anor v Lakeline Properties (NSW) Pty Ltd & Anor [2002] NSWSC 1167
The plaintiffs did not act unreasonably in commencing proceedings as they had an arguable caveatable interest; however, the first defendant also acted reasonably, particularly through the actions of the receiver/manager. As settlement was reached without a hearing on the merits and both sides held some reasonable positions, it is only appropriate that the plaintiffs recover one-quarter of their costs from the first defendant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings Costs Dispute / Post Settlement; Determination of Costs
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed with an order for one-quarter of plaintiffs' costs against the first defendant including reserved costs but excluding other existing orders as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'caveatable Interest' 'settlement' 'tenancy Agreement' 'amendment of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Costs Dispute / Post Settlement; Determination of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiffs acted reasonably in commencing proceedings to extend a caveat over land.' 'Whether the first defendant acted reasonably in defending the proceedings and its conduct during negotiations.' 'Whether the plaintiffs were entitled to some or all of their costs after negotiated settlement without trial on the merits.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs did not act unreasonably in commencing proceedings as they had an arguable caveatable interest; however, the first defendant also acted reasonably, particularly through the actions of the receiver/manager. As settlement was reached without a hearing on the merits and both sides held some reasonable positions, it is only appropriate that the plaintiffs recover one-quarter of their costs from the first defendant.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed with an order for one-quarter of plaintiffs' costs against the first defendant including reserved costs but excluding other existing orders as to costs.
Orders
- ['The proceedings be dismissed.' "The first defendant pay the plaintiffs' one-quarter of the plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings including reserved costs but excluding any other existing order as to costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment