Ingot v Macquarie [2003] NSWSC 1102
Due to substantial and late amendments with no adequate explanation, and resulting prejudice to defendants in wasted costs and necessary changes to cross-claims, it is appropriate to order indemnity costs of and thrown away by amendments, but party/party costs for the application for leave to amend.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Litigation / Costs Decision Following Application for Leave to Further Amend Summons
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs ordered to pay defendants’ costs of application for leave to amend (party/party basis) and costs of and thrown away by amendments (indemnity basis), including costs of necessary or consequential amendments to cross-claims.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'pleadings Amendments' 'indemnity Costs' 'delay in Litigation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Commercial Litigation / Costs Decision Following Application for Leave to Further Amend Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiffs should pay costs of application for leave to amend and costs thrown away by amendments' 'Whether costs should be ordered on an indemnity basis' 'Significance of delay and lack of explanation in seeking substantial amendments']
Ratio Decidendi
Due to substantial and late amendments with no adequate explanation, and resulting prejudice to defendants in wasted costs and necessary changes to cross-claims, it is appropriate to order indemnity costs of and thrown away by amendments, but party/party costs for the application for leave to amend.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs ordered to pay defendants’ costs of application for leave to amend (party/party basis) and costs of and thrown away by amendments (indemnity basis), including costs of necessary or consequential amendments to cross-claims.
Orders
- ['Plaintiffs to pay defendants’ costs of plaintiffs’ application for leave further to amend summons.' 'Plaintiffs to pay defendants’ costs of and thrown away by the amendment, including consequential amendments to cross-claims.' 'Costs payable by plaintiffs for the amendments to be on indemnity basis.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment