Minh Tan Tran v Nicols (Costs) [2015] NSWSC 1735
Applicants failed to establish disentitling conduct by liquidator or public interest justifying costs order departure. The case included hopeless and abandoned claims, resulting in unnecessary costs and delay for the liquidation. The applicants are to pay liquidator's costs, 65% of which are to be paid on an indemnity basis due to the nature and conduct of the litigation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Process for Removal of Liquidator / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Removal Application
- Outcome
- The applicants are to pay the liquidator's costs of the proceedings, 65% of which are to be paid on an indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'removal of Liquidator' 'indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Process for Removal of Liquidator / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Removal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether applicants' conduct or liquidator's conduct warrants departure from the usual costs rule" 'Whether indemnity costs should be awarded for all or part of proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants failed to establish disentitling conduct by liquidator or public interest justifying costs order departure. The case included hopeless and abandoned claims, resulting in unnecessary costs and delay for the liquidation. The applicants are to pay liquidator's costs, 65% of which are to be paid on an indemnity basis due to the nature and conduct of the litigation.
Court Disposition
The applicants are to pay the liquidator's costs of the proceedings, 65% of which are to be paid on an indemnity basis.
Orders
- ["Applicants to pay liquidator's costs of the proceedings" '65% of costs to be paid on an indemnity basis']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment