NRMA Insurance for the Nominal Defendant v Al-Bayati (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 14
Ms Al-Bayati failed to discharge the onus to show that the offers constituted genuine compromise or that the Nominal Defendant's conduct in not accepting the offers was unreasonable, given the grounds of appeal were reasonably arguable. Accordingly, costs will not be assessed on an indemnity basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Indemnity Costs Following Appeal Dismissal / Post Appeal Costs Application
- Outcome
- Notice of motion for indemnity costs dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'offer of Compromise' 'calderbank Letter' 'indemnity Costs' 'appeal Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Indemnity Costs Following Appeal Dismissal / Post Appeal Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should be assessed on an indemnity basis following rejection of an offer of compromise and Calderbank letter in appeal proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Al-Bayati failed to discharge the onus to show that the offers constituted genuine compromise or that the Nominal Defendant's conduct in not accepting the offers was unreasonable, given the grounds of appeal were reasonably arguable. Accordingly, costs will not be assessed on an indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion for indemnity costs dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Notice of motion filed on 28 November 2018 dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment