Alpine Hardwood (Aust) Pty Ltd v Hardys Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 224

Alpine Hardwood (Aust) Pty Ltd v Hardys Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 224

The respondents are not entitled to indemnity costs because they failed to show that the applicants acted unreasonably or imprudently in rejecting their Calderbank offer at the relevant time. The mere rejection of a reasonable offer by an ultimately unsuccessful party does not, without more, warrant indemnity costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Indemnity Costs / Post Judgment Costs Application
Outcome
Notice of motion for indemnity costs dismissed. Respondents to pay applicants' costs of the notice of motion.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers' 'offers of Compromise']
['civil Procedure'] ['costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers' 'offers of Compromise']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion for Indemnity Costs / Post Judgment Costs Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether respondents are entitled to indemnity costs after rejection of a Calderbank offer by applicants who subsequently failed at trial.' "Whether applicants acted unreasonably or imprudently in rejecting the respondents' offer of compromise."]

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents are not entitled to indemnity costs because they failed to show that the applicants acted unreasonably or imprudently in rejecting their Calderbank offer at the relevant time. The mere rejection of a reasonable offer by an ultimately unsuccessful party does not, without more, warrant indemnity costs.

Court Disposition

Notice of motion for indemnity costs dismissed. Respondents to pay applicants' costs of the notice of motion.

Orders

  • ['The notice of motion, filed on 31 January 2002 by the respondents, be dismissed.' "The respondents pay the applicants' costs of and incidental to that notice of motion."]