Wykanak v National Broadcasting Company [NBC] USA [2000] NSWCA 300
There was no error of principle, nor any miscarriage of discretion by Priestley JA in making the orders of 31 July 2000, including the costs order. The proceedings were properly concluded by consent on 26 June 2000, rendering later applications futile and unjustified. No relevant public interest factor warranted a special costs order or further continuation of the proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Dismissal of Notices of Motion in the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Notices of Motion filed on 1 August 2000 and 18 October 2000 dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'public Interest Litigation' 'appeal Procedure' 'discontinuance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Dismissal of Notices of Motion in the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the orders of Priestley JA on 31 July 2000 should be reviewed under s 46(4) Supreme Court Act 1970' 'Whether further procedural steps taken by the applicant after settlement were justified' 'Whether the public interest justified departure from the usual costs order']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error of principle, nor any miscarriage of discretion by Priestley JA in making the orders of 31 July 2000, including the costs order. The proceedings were properly concluded by consent on 26 June 2000, rendering later applications futile and unjustified. No relevant public interest factor warranted a special costs order or further continuation of the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Notices of Motion filed on 1 August 2000 and 18 October 2000 dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Notices of Motion filed on 1 August 2000 and 18 October 2000 are dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment