Radferry Pty Ltd v Starborne Holdings Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 171
As the Radferry directors were substantially successful in the appeal and cross-appeal, having resisted an increase and achieved a reduction of the damages award, costs should follow the event, and thus Starborne Holdings Pty Ltd should pay their costs of the appeal and cross-appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal / Post Judgment (supplementary Reasons on Costs)
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to the Radferry directors for the appeal and cross-appeal; previous costs orders stand.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal / Post Judgment (supplementary Reasons on Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Starborne Holdings Pty Ltd should bear the costs of the appeal and cross-appeal against the Radferry directors' 'Assessment and recalculation of damages awarded to Starborne']
Ratio Decidendi
As the Radferry directors were substantially successful in the appeal and cross-appeal, having resisted an increase and achieved a reduction of the damages award, costs should follow the event, and thus Starborne Holdings Pty Ltd should pay their costs of the appeal and cross-appeal.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to the Radferry directors for the appeal and cross-appeal; previous costs orders stand.
Orders
- ['The orders as to costs made on 18 December 1998 stand.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment