Kora v Ian’s Roofing Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWCATAP 95
The Appeal Panel held that the respondents, as successful parties in an appeal concerning a claim exceeding $30,000, were entitled to a costs order under r 38 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW). There was no disentitling conduct by the respondents and the appellants' submissions were without merit. The Panel exercised its discretion to award gross sum costs of $7,133.71 as claimed by the respondents.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Appeal Costs Decision
- Outcome
- Application for costs granted to respondents; hearing on costs dispensed with; gross sum costs order awarded.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'appeals']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Appeal Costs Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a costs order should be made against the appellants following an unsuccessful appeal.' 'The appropriate rule for costs in the context of an internal appeal involving claims exceeding $30,000.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel held that the respondents, as successful parties in an appeal concerning a claim exceeding $30,000, were entitled to a costs order under r 38 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW). There was no disentitling conduct by the respondents and the appellants' submissions were without merit. The Panel exercised its discretion to award gross sum costs of $7,133.71 as claimed by the respondents.
Court Disposition
Application for costs granted to respondents; hearing on costs dispensed with; gross sum costs order awarded.
Orders
- ['A hearing is dispensed with under s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Act (NSW) 2013.' 'The respondents are to file the invoices on which they rely to support the application for a costs order in the sum of $7,133.71 within seven days of the publication of these reasons.' "Upon compliance with order 2, the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment