Elevate Brandpartners Ltd v Hammond (No 2) [2019] FCA 1598

Each party should bear its own costs on the interlocutory application due to the mixed success of each party on different parts of the case and the impracticality of separating costs.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 25 September 2019
Procedural Posture: Interlocutory Application / Post Interlocutory Orders, Costs Determination
Outcome: Each party is to pay its own costs on the applicants' interlocutory application filed on 3 June 2019.
Legal Topics: ['costs' 'australian Consumer Law' 'copyright' 'trademark Infringement']

['commercial' 'corporations'] ['costs' 'australian Consumer Law' 'copyright' 'trademark Infringement']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Post Interlocutory Orders, Costs Determination

Legal Issues

1 ["Which party should bear the costs of the applicants' interlocutory application filed on 3 June 2019"]

Ratio Decidendi

Each party should bear its own costs on the interlocutory application due to the mixed success of each party on different parts of the case and the impracticality of separating costs.

Court Disposition

Each party is to pay its own costs on the applicants' interlocutory application filed on 3 June 2019.

Orders

["Each party is to pay its own costs on the applicants' interlocutory application filed on 3 June 2019."]