Maxwell-Smith v Hall [No 2] [2013] NSWCA 3
Leave to appeal was granted and orders striking out part of the pleading were set aside because the original decision was made under a misapprehension about the particulars supplied by the applicants, clarified during the appellate process; costs order was not made against applicants because, although they did not initially raise the successful ground, both parties contributed to the confusion and applicants were self-represented.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Post Hearing Orders on Appeal/leave Application
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed by consent; orders 1-4 set aside; no order as to costs as between applicants and third respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'recusal' 'abuse of Process' 'setting Aside Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Post Hearing Orders on Appeal/leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted following orders striking out parts of a statement of claim' 'Whether costs should follow the event where appeal is allowed on a new ground and not on grounds raised by the appellant']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was granted and orders striking out part of the pleading were set aside because the original decision was made under a misapprehension about the particulars supplied by the applicants, clarified during the appellate process; costs order was not made against applicants because, although they did not initially raise the successful ground, both parties contributed to the confusion and applicants were self-represented.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed by consent; orders 1-4 set aside; no order as to costs as between applicants and third respondent.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal in respect of orders 1-4.' 'By consent, allow the appeal and set aside orders 1-4.' 'No order as to costs as between the applicants and the third respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment