AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY. LIMITED v. MARSDEN (NO. 2) [2001] NSWCA 119

AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY. LIMITED v. MARSDEN (NO. 2) [2001] NSWCA 119

The court held that the matters relied upon by both parties were already considered in the original costs order and no circumstances justified reopening the order; thus, the opponent's motion should be dismissed with costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 April 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Costs Motion
Outcome
Opponent's (Mr Marsden's) motion dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'appeals']
['civil Procedure'] ['costs' 'appeals']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Post Judgment Costs Motion

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether costs order dated 13 July 2000 should be reopened and varied.']

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the matters relied upon by both parties were already considered in the original costs order and no circumstances justified reopening the order; thus, the opponent's motion should be dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Opponent's (Mr Marsden's) motion dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ["Opponent's motion dismissed with costs."]