Hurford Hardwood Kempsey Pty Ltd v Kempsey Timbers (Sawmilling) Pty Ltd (No 4) [2019] NSWSC 1331
The plaintiff was unsuccessful in its application for a freezing order, and no sufficient reason was shown to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event; the asserted 'disentitling conduct' was not established on the evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Commercial List / Costs Decision Following Dismissal of Application for Freezing Order
- Outcome
- Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of the plaintiff's notice of motion of 12 September 2019.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'freezing Orders' 'party/party Costs' 'disentitling Conduct']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Commercial List / Costs Decision Following Dismissal of Application for Freezing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should follow the event after unsuccessful application for freezing order' 'Whether disentitling conduct by the successful party justifies deviation from usual costs order']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was unsuccessful in its application for a freezing order, and no sufficient reason was shown to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event; the asserted 'disentitling conduct' was not established on the evidence.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of the plaintiff's notice of motion of 12 September 2019.
Orders
- ["Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of the plaintiff's notice of motion of 12 September 2019."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment