Bondi Beach Foods Pty Ltd v Chadwick (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 308

Bondi Beach Foods Pty Ltd v Chadwick (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 308

Applications to vary the costs order of the primary judge were dismissed because the grounds had already been fully argued and determined. No error by the primary judge was identified or argued at the appropriate time. Given both parties had limited success on appeal, the appropriate costs order is that each party bear its own costs in the proceedings in the Court of Appeal. The notices of motion seeking variation were dismissed, with costs ordered against the applicants for those motions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 December 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeals on Costs and Damages Following Trial Judgment / Post Appeal, Costs Determination
Outcome
Applications to vary the costs orders dismissed; no order as to costs of proceedings in the Court of Appeal, parties to bear own costs except for specific orders within the judgment.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'appeal Procedure' 'contributory Negligence' 'damages Assessment']
['civil Procedure'] ['costs' 'appeal Procedure' 'contributory Negligence' 'damages Assessment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal and Cross Appeals on Costs and Damages Following Trial Judgment / Post Appeal, Costs Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['How costs should be allocated where both parties have mixed success on appeal' 'Whether the costs order at first instance should be varied following the appeal outcome' 'Appropriate application of rule 36.16 for varying judgments/orders']

Ratio Decidendi

Applications to vary the costs order of the primary judge were dismissed because the grounds had already been fully argued and determined. No error by the primary judge was identified or argued at the appropriate time. Given both parties had limited success on appeal, the appropriate costs order is that each party bear its own costs in the proceedings in the Court of Appeal. The notices of motion seeking variation were dismissed, with costs ordered against the applicants for those motions.

Court Disposition

Applications to vary the costs orders dismissed; no order as to costs of proceedings in the Court of Appeal, parties to bear own costs except for specific orders within the judgment.

Orders

  • ['No order as to costs of the proceedings in the Court of Appeal, intention that parties bear their own costs.' 'Dismissal of notices of motion filed by Bucket List and Crossguard on 23 and 24 November 2023.' "Bucket List and Crossguard to pay Mr Chadwick's costs of the notices of motion filed on 23 and 24 November...