Phillips v Tobias Partners Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 653
Given the agreement of the parties and the absence of a principle at issue regarding costs, each party should pay their own costs; a declaration is made allowing set-off for the mathematical error identified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Consequential Orders / Post Judgment Determination of Costs and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Summons and cross summons dismissed - each party to pay their own costs; declaration as to set-off against Local Court order.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Consequential Orders / Post Judgment Determination of Costs and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether each party should pay their own costs' 'How to address a mathematical error in the Local Court judgment' 'Whether any further orders were needed in relation to funds paid into Court']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the agreement of the parties and the absence of a principle at issue regarding costs, each party should pay their own costs; a declaration is made allowing set-off for the mathematical error identified.
Court Disposition
Summons and cross summons dismissed - each party to pay their own costs; declaration as to set-off against Local Court order.
Orders
- ["The Plaintiff's summons is dismissed." "The Defendant's cross summons is dismissed." 'Declare that the Plaintiff is entitled to deduct from the amount he is required to pay to the defendant pursuant to the costs order made by the Local Court on 20 July 2012 the sum of $2,612.50 together with interest on that sum...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment