CSL Australia Pty Limited v Formosa (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 425
Respondent entitled to costs of the appeal on an ordinary basis up to 5 November 2008 and on an indemnity basis thereafter. Cross-respondents entitled to costs of cross-appeal as respondent was unsuccessful on cross-appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal Costs Judgment / Consequential Orders After Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs order varied
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'offer of Compromise']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal Costs Judgment / Consequential Orders After Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Entitlement to costs following offer of compromise' 'Classification of offer as Calderbank offer' 'Application of indemnity costs post-offer']
Ratio Decidendi
Respondent entitled to costs of the appeal on an ordinary basis up to 5 November 2008 and on an indemnity basis thereafter. Cross-respondents entitled to costs of cross-appeal as respondent was unsuccessful on cross-appeal.
Court Disposition
Costs order varied
Orders
- ["Appellants to pay respondent's costs of the appeal on an ordinary basis up to 5 November 2008 and on an indemnity basis thereafter." "Cross-appellant/respondent to pay cross-respondents'/appellants' costs of the cross-appeal." "Appellants to pay half of respondent's costs of the motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment