Ozland Fashion Pty Ltd v Kingsmede Projects Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 763

Ozland Fashion Pty Ltd v Kingsmede Projects Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 763

The defendants' act of calling on the full amount of the bank guarantee in circumstances where their actual claim was for less than $5,000 was unreasonable and outside of good faith contractual entitlement. This conduct justified the plaintiffs in initiating proceedings, and as such, the defendants should pay the costs of the proceedings.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 June 2020
Procedural Posture
Costs Application (originating From Lease Dispute) / Determination of Costs Following Consent Orders
Outcome
Defendants ordered to pay plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'landlord and Tenant' 'bank Guarantees' 'injunctions']
['equity'] ['costs' 'landlord and Tenant' 'bank Guarantees' 'injunctions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Costs Application (originating From Lease Dispute) / Determination of Costs Following Consent Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether defendants acted unreasonably in calling on the full amount of the bank guarantee' 'Whether costs should be ordered against the defendants due to their conduct']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants' act of calling on the full amount of the bank guarantee in circumstances where their actual claim was for less than $5,000 was unreasonable and outside of good faith contractual entitlement. This conduct justified the plaintiffs in initiating proceedings, and as such, the defendants should pay the costs of the proceedings.

Court Disposition

Defendants ordered to pay plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings.

Orders

  • ["Defendants to pay plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings (including the costs of the costs application)."]