Angus Carnegie Gordon in his capacity as liquidator of Lyon Form Pty Ltd (in liq) & Anor v Leon Plant Hire Pty Ltd (in liq) & Ors [2015] NSWSC 662
Costs should follow the event as between Plaintiffs and unsuccessful Defendants, with indemnity costs awarded from date of offer of compromise under r 42.14. Plaintiffs to pay Mrs Dicsiascio's costs for the personal insolvency agreement issue on an ordinary basis, but not on an indemnity basis, as the claim against her was not unreasonable or without merit. Orders made as per short minutes agreed except as to costs, which follows the reasoning above.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Matter / Costs Application / Post Judgment; Determination of Costs and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made for payment of money, declaration of equitable charge, findings on transaction characterisation, and costs orders as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'uncommercial Transaction' 'director Duties' 'personal Insolvency Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Matter / Costs Application / Post Judgment; Determination of Costs and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate orders as to costs including indemnity and ordinary bases' 'Entitlement to costs following an offer of compromise' 'Costs consequences of personal insolvency agreement extinguishing claim' 'Relief against directors and associated entities under ss 588FB, 588FDA, 588FF Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
Costs should follow the event as between Plaintiffs and unsuccessful Defendants, with indemnity costs awarded from date of offer of compromise under r 42.14. Plaintiffs to pay Mrs Dicsiascio's costs for the personal insolvency agreement issue on an ordinary basis, but not on an indemnity basis, as the claim against her was not unreasonable or without merit. Orders made as per short minutes agreed except as to costs, which follows the reasoning above.
Court Disposition
Orders made for payment of money, declaration of equitable charge, findings on transaction characterisation, and costs orders as specified.
Orders
- ['First, Second, Fourth and Fifth Defendants to pay $110,779.55 to Second Plaintiff.' 'Second Plaintiff holds equitable charge over specified land as security for judgment sum.' 'Declaration that payments of $103,000 and $4,450 to Second Defendant were unreasonable director related and uncommercial transactions.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment