Volkswagen Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd v Atlas CTL Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation) – [Costs] [2022] NSWSC 665
Volkswagen was not entitled to indemnity costs because the offer did not result in a less advantageous outcome for the administrators/liquidators and was not unreasonably refused in the circumstances.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff / First Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim: Volkswagen Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd; Second Plaintiff / Second Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim: Ken Whittingham (Receiver and Manager of Atlas CTL Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation)) and PJM Fleet Management Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation); First Defendant / Third Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim: Atlas CTL Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation); Second Defendant / Fourth Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim: PJM Fleet Management Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation); Third Defendant / Fifth Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim: Nissan Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendants / Sixth Respondents to the Fourth Cross Claim: Andrew Stewart Reed Hewitt and Matthew James Byrnes (Receivers and Managers of Atlas CTL Pty Ltd (in Liquidation)(Receivers and Managers Appointed)); Fifth Defendant / Seventh Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim: BMW Australia Finance Limited; Sixth Defendants / Eighth Respondents to the Fourth Cross Claim: Bruno Secatore and Sam Kaso (Receivers and Managers of PJM Fleet Management Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation)); Seventh Defendant / Applicants to the Fourth Cross Claim: Richard Albarran, Richard John Lawrence and John Vouris (Administrators and Liquidators of Atlas CTL Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) and PJM Fleet Management Pty Ltd (In Liquidation))
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Corporations List / Costs After Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs orders made as set out in [11].
- Legal Topics
- Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Volkswagen Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd
First Plaintiff / First Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim
Ken Whittingham (Receiver and Manager of Atlas CTL Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation)) and PJM Fleet Management Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation)
Second Plaintiff / Second Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim
Atlas CTL Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation)
First Defendant / Third Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim
PJM Fleet Management Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation)
Second Defendant / Fourth Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim
Nissan Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd
Third Defendant / Fifth Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim
Andrew Stewart Reed Hewitt and Matthew James Byrnes (Receivers and Managers of Atlas CTL Pty Ltd (in Liquidation)(Receivers and Managers Appointed))
Fourth Defendants / Sixth Respondents to the Fourth Cross Claim
BMW Australia Finance Limited
Fifth Defendant / Seventh Respondent to the Fourth Cross Claim
Bruno Secatore and Sam Kaso (Receivers and Managers of PJM Fleet Management Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation))
Sixth Defendants / Eighth Respondents to the Fourth Cross Claim
Richard Albarran, Richard John Lawrence and John Vouris (Administrators and Liquidators of Atlas CTL Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) and PJM Fleet Management Pty Ltd (In Liquidation))
Seventh Defendant / Applicants to the Fourth Cross Claim
Procedural Posture
Equity Corporations List / Costs After Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indemnity costs should be ordered against administrators/liquidators based on alleged Calderbank offer
- 2 Appropriate orders for costs between parties
Ratio Decidendi
Volkswagen was not entitled to indemnity costs because the offer did not result in a less advantageous outcome for the administrators/liquidators and was not unreasonably refused in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Costs orders made as set out in [11].
Orders
- The Amended Statement of Claim filed 11 March 2022 (fourth cross-claim) is dismissed.
- Judgment for the seventh respondent to the fourth cross-claim against the applicants to the fourth cross-claim for $281,266.39.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment