GN & anor v Public Guardian & anor [2009] NSWADTAP 6

GN & anor v Public Guardian & anor [2009] NSWADTAP 6

The Appeal Panel refused the application for costs, finding the normal requirement that each party bear their own costs should apply. The Appellants conducted themselves properly, had an arguable case, and did not unnecessarily disadvantage the other party. There was no unfairness or special circumstances justifying a costs order under section 88 of the ADT Act as amended.

Parties
First Appellant: GN; Second Appellant: GO; First Respondent: Public Guardian; Second Respondent: GP
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 February 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Application Following Merits Appeal
Outcome
Application for costs refused
Legal Topics
Costs, Guardianship Orders, Tribunal Procedure, Statutory Interpretation
Administrative Law Guardianship Costs Guardianship Orders Tribunal Procedure Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

GN

First Appellant

GO

Second Appellant

Public Guardian

First Respondent

GP

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Costs Application Following Merits Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there are special circumstances or fairness grounds for awarding costs in Guardianship Tribunal appeals under s 88 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 as amended
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings were conducted in a way justifying a departure from usual rule that parties bear their own costs

Ratio Decidendi

The Appeal Panel refused the application for costs, finding the normal requirement that each party bear their own costs should apply. The Appellants conducted themselves properly, had an arguable case, and did not unnecessarily disadvantage the other party. There was no unfairness or special circumstances justifying a costs order under section 88 of the ADT Act as amended.

Court Disposition

Application for costs refused

Orders

  • The application for costs is refused.