Hathway (Liquidator), in the matter of Tightrope Retail Pty Ltd (in liq) v Tripolitis (No 2) [2017] FCA 1198

Hathway (Liquidator), in the matter of Tightrope Retail Pty Ltd (in liq) v Tripolitis (No 2) [2017] FCA 1198

The evidence did not support a finding that the conduct of Kristiana or Robyn failed the overarching purpose of the civil practice and procedure provisions or resulted in wasted hearings. The explanations given concerning the guardianship application and settlement progress were not persuasively contradicted. Therefore, the discretion to award costs against either Kristiana or Robyn should not be exercised.

Parties
First Plaintiff: Stephen Hathway in his capacity as liquidator of Tightrope Retail Pty Limited (in liquidation) and Tightrope Wholesale Pty Limited (in liquidation); Second Plaintiff: Tightrope Retail Pty Limited (in liquidation); Third Plaintiff: Tightrope Wholesale Pty Limited (in liquidation); First Defendant: John Tripolitis; Second Defendant: Kristiana Tripolitis; Third Defendant: Anneliese Tripolitis; Fourth Defendant: Robyn Tripolitis; Fifth Defendant: AMTK Company Pty Limited; Sixth Defendant: The Tripolitis Corporation Pty Limited; Seventh Defendant: Remote Stores Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 October 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceeding (corporate Insolvency) / Post Settlement Costs Application
Outcome
Trustees' (First Defendant's) application for costs dismissed; Trustees to pay Kristiana's costs of the application; no costs order in Robyn's favour
Legal Topics
Costs, Case Management, Overarching Purpose, Practice and Procedure
Civil Procedure Corporate Insolvency Costs Case Management Overarching Purpose Practice and Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Hathway in his capacity as liquidator of Tightrope Retail Pty Limited (in liquidation) and Tightrope Wholesale Pty Limited (in liquidation)

First Plaintiff

Tightrope Retail Pty Limited (in liquidation)

Second Plaintiff

Tightrope Wholesale Pty Limited (in liquidation)

Third Plaintiff

John Tripolitis

First Defendant

Kristiana Tripolitis

Second Defendant

Anneliese Tripolitis

Third Defendant

Robyn Tripolitis

Fourth Defendant

AMTK Company Pty Limited

Fifth Defendant

The Tripolitis Corporation Pty Limited

Sixth Defendant

Remote Stores Pty Ltd

Seventh Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Proceeding (corporate Insolvency) / Post Settlement Costs Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether costs orders should be made for or against certain parties in respect of case management hearings
  2. 2 Whether conduct of the second and fourth defendants failed to have regard to the overarching purpose of civil procedure

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not support a finding that the conduct of Kristiana or Robyn failed the overarching purpose of the civil practice and procedure provisions or resulted in wasted hearings. The explanations given concerning the guardianship application and settlement progress were not persuasively contradicted. Therefore, the discretion to award costs against either Kristiana or Robyn should not be exercised.

Court Disposition

Trustees' (First Defendant's) application for costs dismissed; Trustees to pay Kristiana's costs of the application; no costs order in Robyn's favour

Orders

  • The first defendant's application for the payment of his costs of case management hearings on 16 and 29 November 2016 and 6 December 2016 by the second defendant and of the case management hearings on 9 and 16 March 2017 by the fourth defendant be dismissed.
  • The first defendant pay the second defendant's costs of the application.