A & S Oayda Investments Pty Ltd & Ors v Burns Philip Trustee Co Ltd (in liq) & Ors [1994] FCA 1101
Owing to unsatisfactory conduct and repeated failure to comply with Court directions, indemnity costs orders are justified for the whole proceedings.
- Parties
- First Applicant: YDA Investments Limited; Second Applicant: The Shirt Factory Pty Limited; Third Applicant: Continental Shirts Co Pty Limited; Fourth Applicant: Continental Shirts Manufacturing Co Pty Limited; Fifth Applicant: R O C Oayda; Sixth Applicant: Allen Oayda; First Respondent: A & S Holding US Company (in liquidation); Second Respondent: Estate Mortgage Managers Ltd (in liquidation); Third Respondent: Estate Mortgage Financial Services Ltd (in liquidation); Fourth Respondent: Mercantile Mutual Life Insurance Co Ltd; Fifth Respondent: Martin Madden; Sixth Respondent: Gregory Robertson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Motion Judgment; Orders Following Reasons Delivered
- Outcome
- Orders made as agreed except for costs; indemnity costs awarded to respondents for whole proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Security for Costs, Indemnity Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YDA Investments Limited
First Applicant
The Shirt Factory Pty Limited
Second Applicant
Continental Shirts Co Pty Limited
Third Applicant
Continental Shirts Manufacturing Co Pty Limited
Fourth Applicant
R O C Oayda
Fifth Applicant
Allen Oayda
Sixth Applicant
A & S Holding US Company (in liquidation)
First Respondent
Estate Mortgage Managers Ltd (in liquidation)
Second Respondent
Estate Mortgage Financial Services Ltd (in liquidation)
Third Respondent
Mercantile Mutual Life Insurance Co Ltd
Fourth Respondent
Martin Madden
Fifth Respondent
Gregory Robertson
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Motion Judgment; Orders Following Reasons Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis or party-party basis
- 2 Extent of costs orders: motions only or whole proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Owing to unsatisfactory conduct and repeated failure to comply with Court directions, indemnity costs orders are justified for the whole proceedings.
Court Disposition
Orders made as agreed except for costs; indemnity costs awarded to respondents for whole proceedings.
Orders
- Orders 1 to 14 per short minutes of order dated 15 December 1994.
- Order 15: A & S Holding and Oayda to pay costs of MML, the receivers, John William Murphy and Peter Bernard Allen, and Estate Mortgage Financial Services Limited, in liquidation, of the proceedings, including all motions on an indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment