Fitzgerald, Norman Albert & Anor v Klef Pty Ltd & Ors [1996] FCA 1083
The item 12 fee under the Federal Court of Australia Regulations is not payable upon the filing of a notice of objection to an estimate of costs; such a fee is only charged for the actual taxation of a bill of costs. Therefore, the notice of objection filed on 12 September 1996 was validly filed in accordance with O 62 r 46(3) of the Federal Court Rules and the Federal Court of Australia Regulations.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Norman Albert Fitzgerald; Second Applicant: Margaret Grace Fitzgerald; First Respondent: Klef Pty Ltd (ACN 002 311 453); Second Respondent: Burke Bond Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 005 550 041); Third Respondent: Boolarong Management Limited (ACN 011 065 063); Fourth Respondent: Gomeno Pty Ltd (ACN 010 111 199); Sixth Respondent: David John Beer; Seventh Respondent: Northern Holiday Sales Pty Ltd (ACN 010 993 861)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Review / Taxation Objection / Determination of Objection to Costs Assessment and Related Application
- Outcome
- Objection allowed; declaration made; costs order by consent
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Taxation of Costs, Federal Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Norman Albert Fitzgerald
First Applicant
Margaret Grace Fitzgerald
Second Applicant
Klef Pty Ltd (ACN 002 311 453)
First Respondent
Burke Bond Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 005 550 041)
Second Respondent
Boolarong Management Limited (ACN 011 065 063)
Third Respondent
Gomeno Pty Ltd (ACN 010 111 199)
Fourth Respondent
David John Beer
Sixth Respondent
Northern Holiday Sales Pty Ltd (ACN 010 993 861)
Seventh Respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Review / Taxation Objection / Determination of Objection to Costs Assessment and Related Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the item 12 fee under the Federal Court of Australia Regulations is payable upon the filing of a notice of objection to an assessment of costs by the taxation officer
Ratio Decidendi
The item 12 fee under the Federal Court of Australia Regulations is not payable upon the filing of a notice of objection to an estimate of costs; such a fee is only charged for the actual taxation of a bill of costs. Therefore, the notice of objection filed on 12 September 1996 was validly filed in accordance with O 62 r 46(3) of the Federal Court Rules and the Federal Court of Australia Regulations.
Court Disposition
Objection allowed; declaration made; costs order by consent
Orders
- Declaration that the first respondent’s notice of objection filed 12 September 1996 was filed in compliance with O 62 r 46(3) of the Federal Court Rules and with the Federal Court Regulations.
- Order by consent that the first respondent pay the first and second applicants’ costs of this motion, fixed in the sum of $1,500.00, within 21 days of 19 November 1996.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment