Skalkos v T & S Recoveries Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 281
Despite the potential relevance of proportionality, the long and unexplained delay, absence of the argument below, lack of affidavit from the claimant, and insufficient evidence to show a reasonable prospect of materially reducing the costs assessment warrant dismissal of the application for extension of time.
- Parties
- Claimant: Theodore Skalkos; Opponent: T & S Recoveries Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time Within Which to Apply for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Proportionality, Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Theodore Skalkos
Claimant
T & S Recoveries Pty Ltd
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time Within Which to Apply for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs assessor erred by failing to consider proportionality between the costs awarded and the verdict
- 2 Whether the Master erred in failing to consider proportionality
- 3 Whether an extension of time to appeal should be granted given the delay and circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the potential relevance of proportionality, the long and unexplained delay, absence of the argument below, lack of affidavit from the claimant, and insufficient evidence to show a reasonable prospect of materially reducing the costs assessment warrant dismissal of the application for extension of time.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Application for extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment